..: Forschungsdatenbank :..

Publikation Nr. 2502 - Details

Enjoyed or Bored? A Study into Achievement Emotions and the Association with Barriers to Learning in MOOCs

Henderikx, M., Löhr, A. & Kalz, M. (2019). Enjoyed or Bored? A Study into Achievement Emotions and the Association with Barriers to Learning in MOOCs, In: M. Scheffel, J. Broisin, V. Pammer-Schindler, A. Ioannou & J. Schneider (Hrsg.), Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies. Proceedings of the European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL) 2019 (S.15-27) (Band 11722, 1. Auflage). Cham: Springer.

Sammelband

URL: https://rd.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_2
ISBN: 978-3-030-29735-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_2

Abstract
MOOCs are accessible online personal development opportunities in which learners can expand their knowledge on many topics. Yet, the experience of barriers to learning often hinders learners from achieving their personal learning goals. Therefore, it is important to have insight into determinants that may influence the experience of (certain) barriers. This study investigated whether the emotional determinants enjoyment and boredom, which are known to impact learner achievement and motivation, affect the experience of (specific) barriers while learning in MOOCs. The results show that boredom did affect the experience of barriers related to technical and online related skills, social context and time, support and motivation, yet it did not affect the experience of barriers related to the design of the MOOC. Enjoyment was not correlated to any of the barriers. Furthermore, the same analysis comparing men to women again revealed that boredom did not significantly affect the experience of barriers related to the design of the MOOC, yet did significantly affect the experience of the other barriers. No, significant differences were found between males and females These findings may serve as input for supporting learners in achieving their individual learning goals.

Attribute

Sprache:
Art der Begutachtung:	Peer Review(Double-blind peer review)
Print:	Ja
Online:	Ja, mit Open Access und CC-Lizenz
Datenmedium:	Nein