..: Forschungsdatenbank :..

Publikation Nr. 3080 - Details

What do they TEL(L)? A systematic analysis of master programs in technology-enhanced learning.

Fominykh, M., Weidlich, J., Kalz, M. & Hybertsen, I. D. (2022). What do they TEL(L)? A systematic analysis of master programs in technology-enhanced learning., International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-25.

Artikel

URL: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-021-00305-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00305-7

Abstract
This research revealed the antecedes of two learner-centered outcome measures of success in massive open online courses (MOOCs): learner satisfaction and learner intention-fulfillment. Previous studies used success criteria from formal education contexts placing retention and completion rates as the ultimate outcome measures. We argue that the suggested learner-centered outcomes are more appropriate for measuring success in non-formal lifelong learning settings because they are focused on the learner’s intentions, rather than the intentions of the course developer. The behavioural measures of 125 MOOC participants who answered a pre- and a post-questionnaire were harvested. The analysis revealed that learner satisfaction was directly affected by: the importance of the MOOC’s benefits; online self-regulated learning - goal setting; number of video lectures accessed; and, perceived course usability. Age and the number of quizzes accessed indirectly effected learner satisfaction, through perceived course usability and through number of video lectures accessed. Intention-fulfillment was directly affected by: gender; the importance of the MOOC’s benefits; online self-regulated learning - goal setting; the number of quizzes accessed; the duration of participation; and, perceived course usability. Previous experience with MOOCs and the importance of MOOC’s benefits, indirectly affected intention-fulfillment through the number of quizzes accessed and perceived course usability.

Attribute

Sprache:
Art der Begutachtung:	Peer Review(Double-blind peer review)
Print:	Nein
Online:	Ja, mit Open Access und CC-Lizenz
Datenmedium:	Nein